This blog is written as part of a task assigned by Prof. Dilip Barad, Department of English (MKBU). The blog related to the flipped learning activity. In which students have to watch videos related to the novel 'The Only Story' and reflect upon the videos. For further info you can visit following links for blog and Activity Worksheet module.
1. Video Summaries
Video 1 - Summary of 'The Only Story' | Plot Overview
The novel ‘The Only Story’ by Julian Barnes is about love and its responsibilities, not just the romantic idea of love. The story is told by Paul Roberts, who is between 59 and 70 years old as he remembers his past. This is a memory of his most important love story, which happened 30 years ago when he was 19.
Paul falls in love with Susan Macleod, a 48-year-old married woman. Susan has two daughters, Clara and Martha, and her husband, Gordon Macleod, is an abusive man. Paul and Susan first meet at a tennis club, where only people from the upper class can play. They become close and eventually have a physical relationship. Paul’s parents do not approve of their relationship, but it continues until Paul is around 29 or 30 years old.
Over time, Susan starts drinking and develops a habit of lying. She is a housewife with nothing much to do. Meanwhile, Paul starts thinking about his future and his career. He feels he cannot take care of Susan and decides to go abroad.
Years later, around 15-20 years before the present time, Paul meets Susan one last time. By then, she has become mentally handicapped. Martha, Susan’s daughter, asks Paul to visit her. Susan’s life had been full of suffering—she was beaten by her husband, Gordon, and she eventually died.
Susan’s character has a tragic past. As a child, she was sexually abused by her Uncle Humphrey, which made her uncomfortable with physical relationships later in life. The novel also explores serious issues like child abuse and trauma, similar to themes in movies like ‘Highway and Kahaani 2’.
Julian Barnes tells the story in a rational way, making us think about love, regret, and the difference between being brave and being a coward. The novel is also connected to his Booker Prize-winning book The Sense of an Ending (2011), as both explore memory and the way people look back at their lives.
Video 2 - Character Study: Joan in The Only Story
Susan’s life is full of people coming and going. Before her tragic relationship with Paul, she had an early affair with Gerald, but he died of blood cancer. Later, she had a failed marriage with Gordon and a difficult relationship with Paul.
Joan is Susan’s friend and the sister of Gerald. Gerald’s death deeply affected Joan, leaving her devastated. Over time, she started having affairs and ended up as the mistress of an older married man. However, he later married another woman, leaving Joan alone.
Joan becomes more interested in dogs, showing her emotional withdrawal from people. One of Susan’s dogs, Sibyl, has a mythical reference, Sibyl was a woman loved by a god and given immortality, but it became a kind of curse. This reflects the novel’s themes of love, suffering, and loneliness.
The novel also explores the idea that bliss comes with death, while life is full of pain. Joan, despite being a strong player in life, ends up isolated and focused on her dogs after facing repeated disappointments.
Joan drinks a lot and her behaviour is very strange according to paul because she curses a lot. Susan justifies her behaviour by telling her story and she is straightforward, she does not want to please anyone now, she now knows the realities of life. She is more happy with dogs because they don’t demand anything in return like humans so her philosophy of life is such that pets are more loyal than human beings. Even she is also not happy with the dogs because they also die and one has to live with the memory of them.
Video 3 - Memory and History in The Only Story
The novel explores the connection between history and memory. History is like a collective memory, while personal memory is an individual’s history. Trauma is also a form of memory, shaping how people see the past.
One major question in the novel is: Who is the historian of history? Both history and memory can be unreliable. People doubt the truth of historical events, just like they doubt their own memories.
A good example is the movie Memento, where the protagonist forgets everything every 15 minutes and writes notes on his body to remember things. The film raises a deep question, if memory is taken away, do we lose our moral responsibility for our actions? The novel also explores themes of remorse and how people sometimes tell false stories to themselves to avoid guilt. Other literary examples include The Tell-Tale Heart, Claudius' confession in Hamlet, and Arthur Dimmesdale’s guilt in The Scarlet Letter.
Trauma and Subaltern Identity
The novel connects to trauma studies and subaltern identity, as discussed by Dipesh Chakrabarty in his work on Partition literature. Trauma damages personal spaces and leaves deep emotional scars. Paul Roberts, the protagonist, struggles to tell the true version of his story, showing how memory can be incomplete or distorted.
Connection to The Sense of an Ending
Julian Barnes’ previous novel, The Sense of an Ending, also explores memory and history. A key idea from that novel is:
"History is told by the victors, and history is the self-delusion of the defeated."
Another quote by Patrick Lagrange states:
"History is that certainty produced at the point where the imperfection of memory meets the inadequacies of documentation."
This means history is not always factual, it is shaped by incomplete memories and imperfect records.
Paul’s Moments of Cowardice
There are two important incidents that show Paul's weakness:
Eric and Paul at the fair – Paul and his friend Eric go to a fair, and while returning, they are attacked by thieves. Paul runs away, pretending to seek help, but in reality, he is just scared.
Gordon beating Susan – When Gordon physically abuses Susan, Paul does not fight back. He simply leaves, showing that he cannot stand up for her. This raises the question: Is Paul a coward, or is he simply avoiding confrontation?
Symbolism: Birds and Youthful Fearlessness
A bar scene in the novel is compared to the movie Dil Chahta Hai,where friends are enjoying their trip and company without even saying a word. Paul and another man both seem like that. The man describes another woman; he says a woman rests her head on a man’s shoulder, and he describes it as "as light as a bird." But birds always fly away, and before they leave, they often leave something behind (shit on the shoulder). This could symbolize how love brings both beauty and pain.
The video there is also a reference to Max Verstappen, the famous car racer. It is said that a person’s wrist control is not stable until they turn 25, meaning young people often have fearless energy but lack true courage. This connects to Paul’s journey; his youthful boldness fades, and he struggles with real responsibility in love.
Video 4 - Narrative Pattern in The Only Story
Julian Barnes tells the story in a classic way but with a unique twist. The novel is narrated by Paul Roberts, who is an unreliable narrator. This means that Paul’s version of events may not always be completely true or accurate.
The novel also explores the meaning of a novel itself. In the earliest dictionary definitions, a novel was described as "a small tale, generally of love." This idea connects to the book’s theme—we often share our love victories, but we don’t talk about our love failures.
Barnes directly addresses the reader, making it feel like he is sharing a life lesson he has already learned. He presents certain ideas, but then challenges his own points, creating counterarguments. This technique keeps the reader engaged and makes them question their own beliefs about love and memory.
Another important idea in the novel is about sanity and purpose. People need a goal or a person to help them stay mentally stable. If that purpose is a person, then both will have their own desires, which can lead to conflict. But if the purpose is a goal, there is no opposing desire, so there is no conflict. This reflects the struggles in Paul and Susan’s relationship—love brings passion, but also pain.
Video 6 - Theme of Love/ Passion and Suffering
The word 'passion' is one of those words where the modern application appears disconnected from the original meaning. The word itself comes from the Latin root word, patior, which means to suffer. Its first use in English appeared around 1175 AD. Oddly enough the word is more frequently used in writing than in speech.
Many of the modern applications of 'passion' no longer convey the idea of suffering at all. It's present use is one describing an intense desire, which is often sexual in nature.
The story of 'a youth of 19 years, Paul's passionate attraction towards Susan Macleod, a 48 years old married woman of two daughters' - is nothing but a story of passion turning into suffering.
• This is his story of a life-changing, life-defining passionate love affair, from innocence to experience, from youth to age, from infatuation to weariness.
• It is the story of suffering for both Paul as well as Susan, along with all other family members.
Examples from the novel
"I was nineteen, and I knew that love was incorruptible, proof against both time and tarnish. I have a sudden attack of - what? --fear, propriety, unselfishness? I say to her, thinking she will know more, 'You see, I haven't been in love before, so I don't understand about love. What I'm worried about is that, if you love me, it will leave you less for the other people you love.' I don't name them. I meant her daughters; and perhaps even her husband. 'It's not like that, she answers at once, as if it is something she too has thought about, and has solved. 'Love's elastic. It's not a question of watering down. It adds on. It doesn't take away. So there's no need to worry about that."
Somewhere, in some novel he subsequently read, he had come across the sentence: 'He fell in love like a man committing suicide.' It wasn't quite like that, but there was a sense in which he had no choice. He couldn't live with Susan; he couldn't establish a separate life away from her; therefore he went back to live with her. Courage or cowardice? Or mere inevitability?
An entry from his notebook which had survived several inspections: 'In love, everything is both true and false; it's the one subject on which it's impossible to say anything absurd.
There is also a psychological interpretation of the novel. Jacques Lacan’s interpretation of love or passion says that a person requires something that leads them to move forward in life. It could be a person or a thing or achievement. If a person loves other humans then there are high chances that he/she would suffer but if there is a goal or a thing then it would ask nothing in return.
There is a language that also stops a person from expressing oneself fully. When we feel like laughing we laugh, when we want to cry we cry, but one is asked why he or she is crying or laughing one may not be able to express it in words.
Example: Dream of Susan falling down
“An image comes into your head one day, an image of your relationship to one another. You are at an upstairs window of the house on Henry Road. She has somehow climbed out, and you are hanging on to her. By the wrists, of course. And her weight makes it impossible for you to pull her back inside. It is all you can do to stop yourself being pulled out with her, by her. At one point she opens her mouth to scream, but no sound emerges. Instead, her dental plate comes loose; you hear it hit the ground with a plasticky clatter. You are stuck there, the two of you, locked together, and will remain so until your strength gives out, and she falls. It is only a metaphor - or the worst of dreams; yet there are metaphors which sit more powerfully in the brain than remembered events.”
It says that at this point in the life Paul can not go back; he can not retrieve oneself from the relationship he has with Susan. Now if anything goes wrong with Susan, he also has to go through the same.
Video 7 - Critique of marriage institution
"You are an absolutist for love, and therefore an absolutist against marriage."
The novel is a critique of the marriage institute. One such example is the marriage of Susan and Gordon. Another example of 'Jude the Obscure' is also discussed in the video.
There are many quotes about marriage that are discussed in the novel.
• Marriage is a dog kennel in which complacency lives and is never chained up.
• You have given the matter much thought, and come up with many fanciful comparisons.
• Marriage is a jewellery box which, by some mysterious opposite of alchemy, turns gold, silver and diamonds back into base metal, paste and quartz.
• Marriage is a disused boathouse containing an old, two- person canoe, no longer water-worthy, with holes in the bottom and one missing paddle.
• Marriage is ... oh, you have dozens of such comparisons to hand.
In the comedies we find that there is an ending when man and woman get married, but tragedies start after that. Marriage is the end of love. There is also a reference to this in the novel:
"I remember a woman friend once telling me her theory of marriage: that it was something you should 'dip into and out of as required'. This may sound dismayingly practical, even cynical, but it wasn't. She loved her husband, and 'dipping out' of marriage didn't mean adultery. Rather, it was a recognition of how marriage worked for her: as a reliable ground bass to life, as something you jogged along with until such time as you needed to 'dip into' it, for succour, expressions of love and the rest. I could understand this approach: there is no point demanding more than your temperament requires or provides."
Video 8 - Two ways to look at life
In the video it is discussed that there were two ways of looking at life, or two extremes of viewpoint, anyway, with a continuum between them. If we look at life as a paddle steamer then we have the free will where we want to sail our ship. On the contrary it is seen that life is like a bump on a log that does not have any choice of life. It moves on the will of the circumstances, it does not have any right to choose its journey.
Worksheet
2. Key Takeaways:
After reviewing all the resources, identify the three most important themes or ideas you found most compelling or thought-provoking. For each one:
o Explain the idea in your own words.
o Provide examples from the novel that illustrates the idea.
o Explain why you think the idea is significant for understanding the novel.
Ans
1. Memory we choose to remember and store:
Through the character of Paul Roberts I get to know that the memory we store and revisit is always of our choice. We store the memory we like and erase the part that we do not like. The character does the same when he tells his story he chooses wisely what to remember and what not. Sometimes we store memory in such a manner that there is less part in which our faults are there. One such example is the novel ‘The Artist of the Floating World’, in which it is the first person narrative by Masuji Ono. First he hides the wrong part of what he has done in the past and now he is facing the circumstances of such. Later we get to know about the reality of how he has used his art for the sake of spreading nationalism.
2. The idea of love
In the novel it is very well presented the reality of any couple, married or unmarried. There has always been conflict among the lover if they come closer to fill the gap in themselves. When two people meet it happens that they seek something in each other, if they are able to find the thing really then there is a different story but if they can’t then there are struggles. The very quote in the beginning that "What would you choose, to love more and suffer more and love less and suffer less.”
In the life of Suzanne and Paul we find that they are not able to live happily even after they start living together. Thievery idea of love that is represented in the classical works and in the cinema, Barns breaks that and gives the realistic picture of the world. Same goes with the story of Joan, who loves an older guy and ends up broken-hearted.
3. Seeing one’s own faults
In the novel we find that mannier times Paul tries to hide so many things but still he chooses to see the wrong things done by himself also. He questions himself or rather in reading the novel we get that interpretation that one has to see oneself in faults also rather than only blaming the other. In memory narratives we find there are more chances to alter the story but still if we read minutely we are able to find the faults. The idea of introspection also goes with the same that one has to say truth to oneself rather than hiding the faults.
3. Character Analysis:
Choose two characters from the novel (e.g. Paul,
Suzanne, Joan). For each character, discuss:
o Their role in the narrative.
o Their key traits and motivations.
o How the narrative perspective shapes the reader's understanding of
the character.
o How the character contributes to the themes of the novel
Ans.
Joan:
Joan is Suzanne’s friend and the sister of Gerald. Gerald’s death deeply affected Joan, leaving her devastated. Over time, she started having affairs and ended up as the mistress of an older married man. However, he later married another woman, leaving Joan alone.
Joan becomes more interested in dogs, showing her emotional withdrawal from people. One of Suzanne’s dogs, Sibyl, has a mythical reference, Sibyl was a woman loved by a god and given immortality, but it became a kind of curse. This reflects the novel’s themes of love, suffering, and loneliness.
The novel also explores the idea that bliss comes with death, while life is full of pain. Joan, despite being a strong player in life, ends up isolated and focused on her dogs after facing repeated disappointments.
Joan drinks a lot and her behaviour is very strange according to paul because she curses a lot. Suzanne justifies her behaviour by telling her story and she is straightforward, she does not want to please anyone now, she now knows the realities of life. She is more happy with dogs because they don’t demand anything in return like humans so her philosophy of life is such that pets are more loyal than human beings. She is also not happy with the dogs because they also die and one has to live with the memory of them.
Paul:
Paul Roberts is the protagonist and narrator of The Only Story, recounting his past from the perspective of an older man, between 59 and 70 years old. His character is defined by youthful idealism, emotional intensity, and later, deep regret and disillusionment. At 19, he falls passionately in love with Suzanne, a 48-year-old married woman, believing that love is absolute and "incorruptible." However, as their relationship progresses, he faces the harsh realities of Suzanne’s struggles, including her alcoholism, habitual lying, and traumatic past. Initially, he is driven by a desire for love and connection, but over time, he begins to feel burdened by the responsibilities of caring for Suzanne. This leads him to leave her and move abroad, raising the question of whether his actions stem from cowardice or a pragmatic acceptance of reality. His defining moments of weakness, such as failing to intervene when Gordon abuses Suzanne, further emphasize his inner conflict between courage and self-preservation.
Paul’s role as an unreliable narrator shapes how the reader perceives his story. His recollections of the past are fragmented and subjective, highlighting the novel’s theme of memory’s imperfection. The novel challenges his own beliefs, forcing the reader to question whether his love was truly selfless or if he was merely chasing an idealized notion of romance. His struggle to recount events honestly reflects the broader idea that people often reconstruct their past to make it more bearable, sometimes even deceiving themselves in the process. Through his perspective, The Only Story explores the complexities of love, regret, and self-deception, making the reader aware of how personal history is shaped by selective memory.
Paul's journey contributes significantly to the novel’s exploration of love and suffering, as his passionate relationship gradually turns into a source of emotional and psychological pain. His experiences illustrate how love, once believed to be boundless, can become a burden, leading to inevitable disappointment. His character also embodies the tension between courage and cowardice, as seen in his failure to act in crucial moments. This theme is further reflected in his retreat from responsibility, as he chooses to leave rather than confront the reality of Suzanne’s deteriorating condition. Additionally, the novel critiques traditional institutions like marriage through Paul’s perspective, portraying them as suffocating and ultimately unfulfilling. From a psychological standpoint, Paul aligns with Jacques Lacan’s interpretation of desire—his love for Suzanne initially gives his life meaning, but when that love becomes a source of suffering, he is left struggling with the emptiness of detachment. His character ultimately serves as a vehicle for the novel’s existential themes, showing how love, memory, and regret shape human identity and experience.
4. Narrative Techniques:
Discuss the narrative techniques employed by
Julian Barnes in The Only Story, considering:
o The use of first-person narration and its limitations.
o The shifting perspectives and unreliable narrator.
o The non-linear timeline and use of flashbacks.
o The impact of these techniques on the reader's experience.
o How this narrative is different from other novels you may have read.
Julian Barnes uses interesting ways to tell the story in The Only Story. The novel is written in the first-person, so we see everything from Paul’s point of view. But this also means we only know what Paul thinks, not what really happened. His memory might not be correct, and he might be changing the story to make himself look better or to deal with his guilt. This makes him an unreliable narrator, which means we cannot fully trust his version of events.
The novel does not follow a straight timeline. Paul’s story jumps between different times—his young love with Suzanne, his later struggles, and his thoughts as an old man. This makes the story feel more real, like how people actually remember things in life. Memories are not always clear, and sometimes we remember things differently over time. The way Paul tells his story also changes. At first, he says "I," but later, he talks about himself as "you" or even "he." This shows how he becomes distant from his own past, as if he does not want to admit his mistakes.
These techniques make the reader feel Paul’s emotions more deeply. The novel does not give easy answers about love. Instead of being a happy love story, it shows love can bring pain and suffering. The way the story is told also makes the reader question what really happened and whether Paul is being honest.
Compared to other novels, The Only Story feels different because it does not follow a normal order. Many novels start at the beginning and move to the end, but this novel moves back and forth in time. It also makes the reader think more about memory and truth. This style is similar to The Sense of an Ending, another novel by Barnes, but here, he makes it even more emotional and personal. Instead of a simple love story, it feels like a real person remembering their past, with all the confusion, regret, and sadness that come with it.
5. Thematic Connections:
1. Memory and Unreliability: The Fragile Nature of Truth
The novel shows that memory is unreliable. Paul tells his own story, but his version of events may not be the full truth. He remembers things differently over time, sometimes changing details or leaving things out. This makes the reader question what really happened. The book suggests that truth is not always clear because people remember and interpret events in their own way. This connects to the idea that history is also shaped by those who tell it, not always by facts.
2. Love, Passion, and Suffering: The Price of Desire
Love in the novel is not romantic or happy; instead, it is full of pain and suffering. Paul falls deeply in love with Suzanne, but their relationship leads to struggles and sadness. Love is shown as something that can consume a person, much like passion, which originally meant suffering. This connects to Lacan’s idea that desire always leads to a lack or an emptiness because people chase something they can never fully have. Paul believes love is everything when he is young, but later, he realizes that it can also bring destruction.
3. Responsibility and Cowardice: Running Away from Consequences
Paul is often presented as a coward. When Suzanne is beaten by her husband, Gordon, Paul does not fight for her. Instead, he leaves. Later, when Suzanne becomes emotionally and mentally weak, he also runs away by going abroad. He does not take responsibility for his actions or for Suzanne’s suffering. Because of this, he ends up alone and full of regret. His cowardice affects not only Suzanne but also his own life, as he struggles with guilt and the inability to fully move on.
4. Critique of Marriage: A Trap Instead of a Union
The novel critiques marriage by showing it as something that traps people instead of bringing happiness. Suzanne and Gordon’s marriage is toxic and violent. Paul sees marriage as a place where love dies rather than grows. Instead of being the happy ending of a love story, marriage in the novel is seen as a burden that takes away freedom and passion.
5. Two Ways to Look at Life: Control or Chaos
The book presents two ways of looking at life. One way is to believe that we have control over our lives, like a person steering a boat. The other way is to see life as something that happens to us, like a small object floating on a river without control. Paul starts his life thinking he can control his love story, but in the end, he realizes that life is unpredictable and often painful. This theme makes the reader think about whether people really make their own choices or if life is shaped by forces beyond their control.
6. Personal Reflection:
Consider the question posed at the beginning of the
novel:"Would you rather love the more and suffer the more, or love the
less and suffer the less?".
o How does the novel explore this question?
The novel deeply explores the question: "Would you rather love more and suffer more, or love less and suffer less?" through Paul's life and choices. As a young man, Paul believes that love is worth any suffering. He falls passionately in love with Suzanne, despite the challenges of their relationship. However, as time passes and their love brings more pain than happiness, Paul begins to question whether love is truly worth the suffering.
Through Suzanne’s struggles and Paul’s eventual detachment, the novel suggests that love often comes with pain, and those who love deeply are more vulnerable to heartbreak. Paul starts with the belief that love should be everything, but by the end, he is left alone, reflecting on whether his suffering was worth it. The novel does not give a clear answer but forces the reader to think about their own choices—whether it is better to experience intense love and inevitable pain or to protect oneself by keeping love at a distance.
What are your thoughts on this question, and how does this novel relate to your own experiences and views on love and life?
The novel explores the reality of love, it criticises the very idea of love and happiness. It relates with the idea of passion and suffering, that both go together. There is a void inside of us that we try to fill with various activities, and love is such. We try to find someone who can fill that gap that is inside us. If that goes well then there is no problem but if it doesn’t then there are bigger problems. Because then one is not able to get out of that nor can one live peacefully together. We live with human beings but when we depend on someone else for our own happiness then there are high chances that we will suffer.
7. Journal Entry – Eric’s Thoughts
Paul always had a way of making things more complicated than they needed to be. Love, life, responsibility he turned them all into riddles, questions without answers. I suppose that’s what happens when you think too much. Me? I’ve always preferred to keep things simple. You take what life gives you, and you don’t pretend it’s something else.
That night at the fair still lingers in my mind. The way Paul ran when those thugs came at us. I don’t blame him, not really. Fear does strange things to people. But it was a moment that showed me something about him—something he probably didn’t even want to see in himself. For all his talk about love and courage, when it came down to it, he chose to run.
And Suzanne… I never understood what he saw in her. Maybe it was the thrill, the rebellion, the idea that he was doing something big, something different. But love? I don’t know. I think he wanted to believe in it more than he actually felt it. And in the end, what did it leave him with? A story, maybe. A story that he keeps telling himself, over and over, trying to make sense of it all.
People like Paul, they spend their whole lives looking for meaning in things. But sometimes, there’s no deeper meaning. Sometimes, things just happen. And you move on.
Words: 5083
References:
"Introduction | Character | Plot Summary | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-
MKBU, YouTube, 31 Jan 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46Lxx-C5Tg0
"Joan | Character Study | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 3
Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/st-w_099Yr0?si=OCoRA4CEEaHpXWq8
"Memory Novel | Memory and History | Memory and Morality | The Only Story |
Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 2 Feb 2022,
https://youtu.be/H4yoNBCzrUs?si=Vxc5GQPJqnbOxsYE\
"Narrative Pattern | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 1 Feb
2022, https://youtu.be/395rhgkig1w?si=mqvmqwWBRqOxByZ_
"Question of Responsibility | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube3Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/uBj-ju4RuTo?si=LW1K02vT0oNaw2Fx
"Theme of Love | Passion and Suffering | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-
MKBU, YouTube, 2 Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/7f7hCKtGkGI?si=gCVaaKw0ksJAn4OY
"Theme of Marriage | Critique of Marriage Institution | The Only Story | Julian
Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 3 Feb 2022,
https://youtu.be/SCrSyV2jXzI?si=iLvkpeE_LlO67jpC
"Two Way to Look at Life | The Only Story | Julian Barnes." DoE-MKBU, YouTube, 3
Feb 2022, https://youtu.be/s7Wom7RAqI4?si=EwMPU5omn8eVtnhH
Barad, Dilip. “Flipped Learning Activity Worksheet on The Only Story.” ResearchGate, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388555499_Flipped_Learning_Activity_Worksheet_on_The_Only_Story. Accessed 08 02 2025.
Barad, Dilip. “The Only Story.” The Only Story, 3 Feb. 2022, blog.dilipbarad.com/2022/02/the-only-story.html. Accessed 08 Feb. 2025.
Barnes, Julian. The Only Story. Jonathan Cape, 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment